Uh oh, Chango! Looks like them crazy Muzzies just won’t let up! Not content with conducting high-intensity jihad on kafirs like me, in the form of suicide attacks and blasphemicide, they also continue their low-intensity jihad on their own womenfolk right under our noses.
The blight known as—burqa!
Yes, my readers—with the aid of said garm, those atrocious abdullahs conspire to keep their sisters-in-Allah in silent subjugation.
Thus, you can be sure that every breath beneath the burqa is a breath benighted—and wretchedly so, at that!
What can the West do to thwart this Salaamic scourge?
Looks like those Sisters-in Submission could use a nice, strong Big Brother to protect them, huh?
We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind netting, cut off from all social life, deprived of identity, that is not the idea that the French republic has of women’s dignity.
Dignité, égalité, identité…
France’s lower house of parliament has overwhelmingly approved a bill that would ban wearing the Islamic full veil in public.
There were 335 votes for the bill and only one against in the 557-seat National Assembly.
Yes, another success story for Madame Liberté in the Free World…
…if you’re as gullible as fuck, that is!
Anyone who really thinks that imposing one’s tastes on others equates to “liberation” has really been done in by doublethink, that selfsame mindset that allows sanctimonious Dworkinites to “liberate” their fellow females from the oppression of making a choice.
Which reminds me…
Many of the opposition Socialists, who originally wanted the ban limited only to public buildings, abstained from voting after coming under pressure from feminist supporters of the bill.
Sure, I don’t doubt that some patriarchal abdullahs force their wives and daughters to shroud up, nor that such behaviour is troubling from a standpoint of liberty.
No more so than forcing the female faithful who want to shroud up to do otherwise—and yes, my bleeding hearts, they do exist.
So far, many of the rationalizations for banning have run along “female emancipation” lines. I call bullshit on this; if helping Muslim females really is the objective, how the fuck do you explain this?
It envisages fines of 150 euros (£119) for women who break the law…
Seems like the only thing these Salaamic sisters are being “liberated” from is their daily bread.
It also seems the democratards and feminazis failed to consider a possible knock-on effect of their “liberating” legislation:
A husband has vowed to keep his wife indoors after she became the first woman in Italy to be fined for wearing a burka in public.
Own goal, feminumpties!
Other excuses play up the “security threat” aspects of facial concealment, noting that it’s easier for the veiled to commit crimes with impunity.
Sooo…what are we dealing with here: poor, pious princesses petrified under purdah, or hardened, wilful crims? Methinks this script suffers from continuity errors!
Besides, the last time I checked, suicide bombers weren’t known for fleeing the scene of the crime.
Also, once you consider this…
Although government officials insist that the ban is not discriminatory against Muslims because it applies to everyone, exceptions to the ban exist including motorcycle helmets, and masks for health reasons, fencing, skiing or carnivals.
…the whole “security threat” aspect falls into collapse.
How many Crimewatch clips do you watch where some chancer robs a bank or rapes a bird whilst wearing a niqab? When did the bike helmet and ski mask cease to be designer items for those sneaky cunts? And if you wanted to commit a random act of violence, wouldn’t a crowded carnival, with its relative security in numbers, prove a useful cover in addition to your festive false face?
I reckon them there bank-robbing ninja rapists won’t shift in their sleep over this one! What kind of criminal observes the law, anyhow?
It seems much of the brouhaha over the burqa—in France and beyond—comes down to vague feelings of “intimidation”. Might as well ban hooded tops; gangsta rap; heavy metal; body-building; violent media; porn; and intelligence, then! After all, someone, somewhere, might just shit bricks over ‘em!
That, or get the lurgies.
Replace “intimidation” with “temptation”, “burqa” with “bosoms”, and you’ve got something approaching the justification for pro-burqa legislation in certain Middle Eastern lands. Arrogant ayatollahs spit down their edicts and prohibitions from their bully(!) pulpits, viciously punishing anyone who deviates from their idea of utopia.
It doesn’t matter whether we’re talking theocratic mullahs enforcing Sharia upon the populace; or state-secularist mullahs of Belgium, Spain, Italy, and France limiting female clothing options to pacify their majorities (thus securing votes)—I know affirmative action when I see it!
“Ah, m’sieur MRDA, it izz différent in France—here we have laïcité!”
Ah, laïcité—the sacred principle of the Republique Française that forbids religion from infringing on affairs of governance.
Such a shame that, in practice, it fails to work the other way round.
As I see it, all this wanton banning of religious apparel signifies nothing less than jealousy. Yup, you read that right—jealousy of the type ironically exemplified by Yahweh’s edict: “Thou shalt have no other Gods but me!”
On your knees, Christlings! Face down, arse up, abdullahs! Hindus, observe the new varna! All you believe in is fraud! In the name of Democracy, bow down and worship at the altar of Totalitarian Humanism!
Napoleon once said: “Vanity made the Revolution; liberty was only a pretext.” I view the burqa ban in a similar vein.
Whether the French Constitutional Council (and European Court of Human Rights) will see it that way in September is another matter….