On the world stage, it looks like errrrrrrybody’s sucking dick regarding Julian Assange, in some form or other.
It seems he’s been letting more than just government documents leak all over the place.
Says the Mail,
Assange, 39, was attending a seminar in Stockholm earlier this month when he found himself facing charges of rape and sexual molestation – charges that were then, amid much confusion, withdrawn and which he strenuously denies.
What does not seem to be in dispute is that he had sex with the two women within four days.
The plot thickens when the nature of said “rape” gets dragged into the light; it turns out that in the Enlightened Paradise That Is Sweden, “rape” has a definition broader and sloppier than Aurora Snow’s rectum.
According to Assange’s barrister, James D. Caitlin,
Apparently having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape. That is the basis for a reinstitution of rape charges against WikiLeaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.
Just in case you’re rolling your eyes with suspicions of bias, try this excerpt from Declassified on for size:
Claes Borgstrom of the Stockholm law firm Borgstrom and Bostrom, who is representing two women who said they had sexual relationships with Assange….acknowledged that the principal concern the women had about Assange’s behavior—which they reported to police in person—related to his lack of interest in using condoms and his refusal to undergo testing, at the women’s request, for sexually transmitted disease.
The tragicomedy just writes itself! I bet the aspiring fathers of Sweden are ejecting every bodily fluid but one over this law; with the noise being made in some quarters about declining European birth rates, could Swedish legislators be candidates for a future Darwin Award?
It certainly shares the award with Iceland for the Most Clit-Whipped State in the Western World, once again proving that what passes for Progressivism is anything but progressive.
And who are the fiendish females exploiting this legislated retardation?
Meet Anna Ardin, described by Göran Rudling as “christian, feminist, social democrat, animal rights activist, and opponent of abortion on the left political scene”; unwittingly channelling many an animé heroine, this neo-Dworkinite, Christionic Sailor Moon claims that she “burns for peace and justice… for a just, open society of solidarity”.
Let’s not forget her partner in (fabricating) crime, and Sister-in-Christ Sofia Wilen.
Folk with more patience than my current self took the time to piece together the chain of events leading up to and beyond the “rapes”. To sum it up in a nutshell, though, these two teamed up when they found out that Assange gave each of them a groupie plug within the same timeframe; prior to discovering his penchant for playing Musical Muffs, the two seemed to get along pretty well with their dreaded defiler.
Once they found out he’d been anointing both their Holy-of-Holies, they shut their legs and—ironically—opened up Hell.
Cue the bitching from Wilen about him doing what first caught her attention (i.e. wikileaking on his laptop) rather than slobbering over her from the get-go.
And cue the lamb of God Ardin’s seemingly applying the ‘7 Steps of Legal Revenge’ she cribbed from an eHow article.
And that’s not even addressing the conveniently erased Tweets, and this rather garbled mess of a testimony:
It is quite wrong that we were afraid of him. He is not violent and I do not feel threatened by him….In both cases, what started out as voluntary sex subsequently developed into an assault. The other woman wanted to report rape. [The] responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man who has a twisted attitude to women and a problem with taking ‘no’ for an answer.
So…it was…a non-violent assault, then?
Do I smell a rat—or rather a wolf?
My already low estimation of my government will fall below zero if they deport Assange on such shaky grounds.
Then again, this extradition could be, as suspected by some, part of a long-play strategy by the American Leviathan to extract its pound of flesh from the libertine leaker. Whether or not that’s accurate, his incarceration certainly makes such action a distinct possibility, especially if Ardin’s alleged links to the CIA are anything to be believed.
Feminazis and Leviatrons! Big Brother and Big Sister! The kind of Left/Right coalition Keith Preston certainly wouldn’t endorse!
I’ve been waiting on your input re: this world-wide-bone-biting-pay-no-attention-to-the-man-behind-the-curtain topic.
that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.
The laughing stock train departed Sweden in this regard quite some time ago. While anything but a laughing matter, not taking seriously and keeping under a rug (pun intended) numerous muslim on Swedish women rapes, while dragging this no-condom-equals-rape issue (even tho I perfectly understand why it’s being publicized) makes Sweden for a perfect, model of modernity lap dog.
especially if Ardin’s alleged links to the CIA are anything to be believed.
Only if CIA is a *cough* code word for Soros, then yes.
Do I smell a rat—or rather a wolf?
In my modest opinion, if I may: you smell a dirty, ugly, rotten rat.
Deratisation chambers are in order,if you ask me.
Then again, this extradition could be, as suspected by some, part of a long-play strategy by the American Leviathan to extract its pound of flesh from the libertine leaker.
Leave USA out of this. USA does not extract pound of flesh, only gets a pound of flesh extracted.
Look at the big picture, don’t take this at the face value, read between the lines of this screenplay, ask who profits.
Libertine leaker? You can do better than this.
Pingback: World Spinner
Pingback: "That’s Rape in Sweden!" « Attack the System
Interesting how people assume that a person’s highminded motives in one area of their life must extend to the rest of their endeavours???
Interesting how people post baseless comments on other people’s thought-processes.