Duty: Mencken Delivers the Deathblow!

First printed in the Smart Set, May 1919, p. 51. Reprinted in A Second Mencken Chrestomathy, 1994, p. 351.

image2

Some of the loosest thinking in ethics has duty for its theme. Practically all writers on the subject agree that the individual owes certain inescapable duties to the race—for example, the duty of engaging in productive labor, and that of marrying and begetting offspring. In support of this position it is almost always argued that if all men neglected such duties the race would perish. The logic is hollow enough to be worthy of the college professors who are guilty of it. It simply confuses the conventionality, the pusillanimity, the lack of imagination of the majority of men with the duty of all men. There is not the slightest ground for assuming, even as a matter of mere argumentation, that all men will ever neglect these alleged duties. There will always remain a safe majority that is willing to do whatever is ordained—that accepts docilely the government it is born under, obeys its laws, and supports its theory. But that majority does not comprise the men who render the highest and most intelligent services to the race; it comprises those who render nothing save their obedience.

For the man who differs from this inert and well-regimented mass, however slightly, there are no duties per se. What he is spontaneously inclined to do is of vastly more  value what the majority is willing to do. There is, indeed, no such thing as duty-in-itself; it is a mere chimera of ethical theorists. Human progress is furthered, not by conformity, but by aberration. The very concept of duty is thus a function of inferiority; it belongs naturally only to timorous and incompetent men. Even on such levels it remains largely a self-delusion, a soothing apparition, a euphemism for necessity. When a man succumbs to duty he merely succumbs to the habit and inclination of other men.

Posted in Amoralism, Egoism, Ethics, Philosophy, Society | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Load of Old Kony

No matter which direction you veered down the fibre-optic freeway over the past three weeks, you’d have been hard-pressed to avoid a head-on collision with Invisible Children and their half-hour campaign vehicle. In my case, said vehicle crashed into me, thanks to the steering of overzealous folk on Facebook.

Wanting to see what everyone was fussing about, I gave it a click; for half an hour, I watched ‘n’ listened to an age-old African story retold with new places and faces; amongst all these faces—of mutilated villagers, sobbing orphans, indoctrinating filmmakers—one held elevation above all others: that of kiddy-snatching LRA warlord Joseph Kony.

image6

It just so happens that the high-minded humanitarians at the IC want to put an end to the Carl Weathers impersonator’s 26-year-career by making him more notorious than Biggie. With his “Kony Action Kits”, moral absolutism, and a little nudge-nudge-wink-wink in the direction of pop stars and politicos, IC co-founder and video vixen Jason Russell hopes to end the Kony menace by making Pavlovian pop art out of him.

image12

Watching the vid, however, inspired everything but humanitarian urges in me. Whereas a generation of bleeding hearts saw a new avenue for hope, change, and Care Bear Stares, I saw half an hour of digitally-engineered emotional manipulation in the name of Team America: World Police. Images of kids crying on camera; Russell indoctrinating his spawn with his Saturday morning morality; the constant nods ‘n’ prods toward George W. Obama interventionism; and the “poignant” piano music left me wondering why a sick bag wasn’t included in the Kony kits. It all reminded me of that crazy chugger bird who accosted me with her clipboard, that one time; that, and the copious charity ads which employ the same techniques on half the budget.

Still, touch a humanitarian’s holy of holies and be prepared to be covered in emojaculate.

My distinct lack of enthusiasm (read: derision) toward the IC campaign met with admonishments from an acquaintance endorsing it, who saw fit to tar me as a conspiracy-theorizing psychopath; I also got the textbook “so what’s your solution” spiel, as if I had been the one to raise the issue.

Elsewhere on the webworld, I noticed a similar pattern of righteous rebuke against those who expressed anything other than wide-eyed endorsement of Konymania: folk with half a brain being castigated for not being “constructive”; for not doing the bleeding hearts’ research for them; for not carrying the Cross; for “doing nothing”.

“At least we’re doing something,” rang the chorus from the ConcernedTM. “What are you doing, huh? WHAT’S YOUR SOLUTION?”

For starters, perhaps you could try some fucking thinking, instead of parroting slogans more befitting of a bomberventionist.

For all their prattle about “raising awareness”, both they and their IC idols seem to have sleepwalked through the last decade of Western foreign policy and the “humanitarian” justifications for such. I mean, what else could explain IC tossing Obama’s salad over his LRA-Disarmament bill?

The comprehensive White House strategy that you released in November of 2010 to address this issue included a range of measures intended to help reduce and mitigate the effect of LRA violence in the region, and produced new hope for an end to the group’s atrocities. Through its implementation, your Administration has helped improve cooperation among regional governments, expanded programs that provide early warning of LRA attack to vulnerable communities, and invested increased resources in efforts to help LRA fighters and abductees defect peacefully. Your decision to deploy U.S. military advisors to the region in October of 2011 was a welcome measure of further assistance for regional governments in their efforts to protect people from LRA attacks. For these actions, we applaud your leadership and encourage sustained commitment.

It turns out one of the policy directives in said bill is

providing political, economic, military, and intelligence support for viable multilateral efforts to protect civilians from the Lord’s Resistance Army, to apprehend or remove Joseph Kony and his top commanders from the battlefield in the continued absence of a negotiated solution, and to disarm and demobilize the remaining Lord’s Resistance Army fighters

Look What I Did frontman Barry Donegan provided a nice, plausible take on it:

While the well-meaning people at IC might believe that the US Military is an effective assassin or policeman for the arrest, murder, or capture of individual non-state aggressors, the millions of lives lost in a multi-country pursuit of Osama Bin Laden prove the exact opposite.
In reality, allowing the US Military to intervene in the Ugandan civil war will doubtlessly involve one of three things:
(1) An invasion with ground forces to “promote stability” and “train Ugandan forces”. This would quickly deteriorate into an occupation, much like what is going on in Iraq or Afghanistan.
(2) “Targeted” missile strikes. Essentially, rumors from third-world individuals with limited technological capacity will be used to generate coordinates whereby large missiles will be fired in hopes of hitting Joseph Kony. The target will likely be missed, and civilian casualties will be considered acceptable “collateral damage.”
(3) Unmanned drones will roam the countryside bombing various homes rumored to be owned by members of the LRA faction. (See: Rural western Pakistan or the plot to Terminator 2)

This deadly bill clearly gives the President full authority to provide “military… support” to attack one thousand persona non grata that may be located in Uganda. However, they may also be located in nearby areas like the Sudan. Since a venue is not cleanly indicated in the language, any President could use this military authority to go into nearly any country in the region so long as a news article in Reuters rumored members of the targeted organization to be present.

Of course, the boys at IC don’t want anything as grandiose as full-blown bombervention; only for US military personnel to act as “advisors” to the Ugandan army…

…kinda like the early days of Nam.

On the topic of the Uganda Peoples Defence Force, it really does Russell and co no favours to throw in their lot with that lot: it’s one thing to work with, say, looters to take down killers and rapists, but it’s downright tragicomic when the very side you side with engages in the exact same behaviour you claim to combat.

Two soldiers appeared from behind a bush. They took the girls and their mother to a secluded spot before forcing the children to undress. Then, with their mother looking on, the soldiers raped the girls. Once they had finished, the soldiers swapped.

…But the men who raped Jennifer and Evelyn were not in the LRA. They were the UDPF – the government army sent to the camps to protect people from the LRA.

The attack was not an anomaly. Rights groups have documented a series of violations by the UDPF, including murder, against the people whom they were sent to protect.

The Independent

The report alleges that the UPDF terrorized countless Congolese women and girls with rapes, looted mineral and timber resources, and killed hundreds of Congolese civilians, even burning people alive.

ugandansabroad

a Child Soldiers Report of 2008, which was prepared by the Coalition to Stop the use of Child Soldiers, a London-based organisation formed by leading international humanitarian groups to stop the use of child soldiers in war, claims that the UPDF continued to hold children captured from the LRA for longer than the 48-hour limit specified by UPDF regulations, and to use children for intelligence-gathering or to identify weapons caches.
“In 2005, children who escaped or were captured or released from the LRA were reportedly pressured by the UPDF to join their forces and fight the LRA,” reads the report.
The Child Soldiers Report 2008 further alleges that children below the age of 15 continued to serve in Local Defence Units (LDUs) throughout 2007.
According to the report, local government officials said the under-18s were often lured to enlist in the army by the promise of pay and because of a lack of alternative educational or employment opportunities.

The Monitor

Seeing as the LRA fucked off out of Uganda ages ago, whilst the UPDF are the standing army of Uganda, aren’t the latter a more pressing concern for the country’s poor, beleaguered citizens?

Moreover, isn’t the government behind the guns the same one that made headlines for their queer-unfriendly policies, a year or two back? It makes me laugh that many of the folk who wrung their hands whilst watching The World’s Worst Place to be Gay now unwittingly implore the villains of that piece to help “make a difference” for the sake of swayed sentiment.

In short, those uplifters done scored an own goal.

Other standout aspects of the anti-Kony vid are the parallels between the IC and those they “hunt”. When it comes down to it, I doubt there’s any essential difference between the swathes of fist-pumping, slogan-spouting IC Jugend who signed on for this campaign and the child cannon-fodder comprising Kony’s crew; if anything, the latter at least have the excuse of being kidnapped and indoctrinated at gunpoint. Similarly, how does Russell imprinting his Manichean morality onto his kid (and the rest of the world) differ, in any fundamental sense, from Kony’s messianic mumblings to his fledgling flock? As I see it, despite their superficial differences and Russell’s stated opposition to him, both he and Kony come across as kin beneath the skin, each scouting for impressionable young recruits to serve as their soldiers.

Contrary to the claims that, if nothing else, KONY 2012 helps “raise awareness” (the last refuge of the slacktivist scoundrel), this vid seems to have done just the opposite, at least in regard to alternative alleviations that have fuckall to do with World Police-worshipping cults of personality; then again, that’s not really surprising, seeing as the alternatives lack the Good Guy Badges (or Bracelets) that signal one’s credentials as “an advocate of awesome”. For all the harping ‘n’ hectoring from those who suddenly became aware of Africa’s existence and their calling as Invisible Child Soldiers, I don’t see them doing much more than “raising awareness” about what Concerned Citizens of the World they are.

image5

As an astute observer pointed out…

There’s this weird double-standard my butthurt Kony friends have wherein posting propaganda on Facebook is “doing something” but criticizing that propaganda is not.

If their guru’s public conduct is anything to go by, all the cheering and chiding from KONY 2012 supporters amounts to nowt more than a sanctified jerk-off session, one which has drowned all cognition in a putrid pool of emojaculate.

~MRDA~

Posted in America, Moral Panic, News, Perspectivism, Politics, Religion, Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

“Mums’ Army”? Gimme a Fucking Break!

It occurred to me, after knocking out the last Infernal installment, that I’d overlooked one other important player in the gynocentric atrocity-porn game:

427244_339831472718046_1709394896072

Now, as much as I laughed up the trashiness of Chat et al, along with their crass attempts at reader therapy, those mags at least limit their superegoistic ambitions to a two minute hate (or however fucking long it takes to trawl through their bindings). Not so with the misnamed Take a Break, which not only indulges in the same Slimy Stepdad sensationalism as its rivals, but also has the nerve to mount and maintain its own morality militia.

image_thumb5

Yes, ladies and reprobates, form a defensive line ‘cos the Mums’ Army’s on the march!

Their chief weapon? The strategy of the nagging fishwife, it seems:

Over 350 campaigners, 15,000 supporters – a new political force is born. Mums’ Army is a pressure group which wishes to push the problem of antisocial behaviour higher up the political agenda, and keep it there.

Whatever the government says, antisocial behaviour continues to grow and is getting worse. We accept that the government is doing something, but we want to make sure that it’s not just words, it’s action.

Antisocial behaviour is a massive long-term problem. It is easy for the government to make a big fuss one day and to forget about it the next. Mums’ Army is here to make sure that they don’t forget about it, that they continue to combat it month after month, year after year.

So what do these so-called warrior women want, exactly? Well, amongst other things, tackling “antisocial behaviour” ranges from sympathetic goals like this…

The balance of the law needs to come down in favour of the victim and not the yob. There is too much fuss about the yob’s human rights. What about the human rights of people to live in peace without the fear of intimidation?

…to abject shite like this…

To discourage commercial elements which encourage youngsters to bully and disrespect others – such as violent films, computer games, song lyrics, websites, and irresponsible television programmes. Then to be enforced with regulation and severe penalties for vendors who breech them.

…which reinforces my contempt for any group with “mums” in its moniker.

But, perhaps I’m being too harsh; perhaps I should find out exactly what they mean by “regulation” before bringing my gavel down on their thick skulls.

Turns out The Daily Scoundrel got there first, back in 2009:

Seems, in this week’s edition of women’s real-life mag Take A Break, the editor’s mounting a campaign (along with the more motherly of the magazine’s readership) to ban the Grand Theft Auto and Manhunt series.

Predictably, much of it is nonsense, and clearly written by someone who’s never even had the slightest interest in playing the games in question, not even for the sake of journalistic integrity.  Here are a few choice quotes:

“The magazine’s philosophy? Bringing mum’s together, taking back our streets from yobs, campaigning to end violence against women” – all of which, the article claims, are supported by Rockstar’s GTA and Manhunt titles.

“Rockstar stood for women as victims, prostitutes and sexual objects,” the article subsequently claims. “Take A Break stood for women as campaigners, mothers and a force for good.”

And eventually, with some conviction, “We’re happy to go on record on behalf of our readers to say we think that such games should be censored.”

It gets worse still.  I ranted about ITV’s gaming addiction documentary a bit ago, and much of what angered me there can be applied here.  Check this shit out:

“[The games’] defenders claim that players can easily tell the difference between sordid fantasy and cold reality. But a steady stream of crimes have been linked to violent video games since they first went on sale.  Only last August yet another murder was linked to Grand Theft Auto – this time after an 18-year-old stabbed a taxi driver in Thailand.  He wanted money to play the game” (??) “and said it made killing ’seem easy’.”

And, amazingly, this:

“Authorities in Thailand immediately banned [Grand Theft Auto]. Sadly the UK doesn’t take the mental health of its children as seriously.”

Wow.

Wow, indeed! If intellect is mostly a matter of genes, I think the damage to the “mental health” of their progeny has already been done! Every time a rabid replicator employs such “reasoning”, I wonder why Project Prevention doesn’t broaden its scope beyond the hopelessly drug-addicted.

As I previously scribed,

If it ain’t a nonce trying to molest a friendly child, it’s a “concerned” parent, politico, or paper trying to molest the rest of the world into child-friendliness…

Still, my ire bursts into laughter when I ingest the abject irony of the situation; a crusade against fictional “atrocity”, waged by the creators and consumers of a mag that exploits (presumably) real atrocity for monetary gain.

Much like the magazine itself—tragicomic.

302748_257512594283268_170939489607246_847782_628923034_n1

Which raises the question: does the Take a Break team believe its own bullshit with this moral crusade, or does it just want to crowd out what it perceives as its competition in the shock-horror stakes?

296993_260820033952524_170939489607246_859907_1520491429_n

Whatever the answer, it’s rather blinkered of them to bitch about Rockstar pimping women as “victims” and “sexual objects” when they pretty much play the same game.

308981_280437005324160_1709394896072

If they really took their campaign seriously—followed their logic all the way down—that lot would’ve switched careers (or signed on) ages ago, dissolving their ravenous readership in the most absolute way.

As things stand, the UK suffers the spectacle of sisterly shrews begging Big Brother to bring his boot down on those who would degrade the female—at the behest of a myopic mag which does just that (whilst “standing for” men as cads, killers, and kiddy-fuckers, of course).

Good show, mama bears!

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a finger wagging in a human face…

image11_thumb

…till tea time every Thursday.

~MRDA~

Posted in Civil Liberties, Entertainment, Ethics, Gender Issues, Moral Panic, Politics, Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Tragicomedy: On Sale At A Newsagent Near You!

A newsagent excursion brought this Great British phenomenon back to my attention, a few weeks ago:

408065_351950531501084_1112811755680

Seeing this again, I did what I always do when confronted with it: I laughed.

Nothing brings me joy quite like casting eyes on the cover of a women’s weekly; there’s something about the juxtaposition of smiles and suffering that I find grotesquely fascinating…

Continue reading

Posted in Amoralism, Entertainment, Ethics, Gender Issues, Moral Panic, Personal, Psychology, Retinal Reprobation, Society, The UK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Off-Colour Remarks

image2

Last fortnight yielded something of a surprise: black MP Diane Abbott being dragged across the airwaves for a racial faux pas. Given the recent emphasis on white wrongdoings (Emma West, the Stephen Lawrence trial), plus the downplay of violence perpetrated by racists of colour, I expected a few white-hostile tweets to sink to the bottom of the media septic tank.

As it stands, this white-unfriendly slab of racial essentialism received anomalous exposure:

image3

With some Mad Lib tweaks, you can get the thought process of the typical Stormfronter who tags any behaviour he disagrees with “Jewish”.

I had a right laugh at Abbott’s ensuing backpedal in the wake of this revelation…

Tweet taken out of context. Refers to nature of 19th century European colonialism. Bit much to get into 140 characters.

Yeah, Diane, that word limit must’ve made it rrrreal difficult to use the correct tense; last time I checked, neither you nor I lived in Victorian England!

Still, she’s onto something when she talks of being “taken out of context”, albeit, not in the way she tried to spin it. The now-notorious tweet sprang forth from Abbott’s convo with one Bim Adewunmi, a freelancer concerned about the collectivist laziness of identity politics:

image13

Abbott’s tweet, then, formed part of a racial reprimand: a cheap herding tactic sculpted to silence the heretics and dissenters within. It doesn’t help that she hashtags “don’t wash dirty linen in public” underneath her calls for conformity.

She might as well have scribed: “Shut up and toe the line, or, I’ll revoke your black card, so help me, Plato!” It amounts to the same sentiment. Just ask Jade Knight, whose Blackness Quotient was declared nonexistent by Abbott on account of her Tory sympathies.

For all their cries of “diversity” and “tolerance”, deviation is actually something ambulance-chasing race whores have trouble tolerating. As well as the aforementioned, this clusterfuck of a scenario gave us Lee Jasper, race hustler extraordinaire, likening Diane’s detractors to the Ku Klux Klan (A white knight lambasting others as white Knights—cute!); and Guardianistas tarring folk who actually give a shit about racial equity as “right-wingers”.

The trouble with these self-glorified Messiahs who fancy themselves as voices of the voiceless is that their status relies on their perceived pets remaining well…voiceless. When Abbott admonishes Adewunmi to “show more public solidarity”, she’s, at bottom, doing nowt more than protecting her precarious position as an overseer of British blackhood; understandable, what with it keeping her so well-fed.

Abbott and her ilk remind me of trade union tsars who, in the name of the hypothetical worker (and their own pocketbooks), happily dismiss the flesh ‘n’ blood worker as a “scab” for fulfilling his function. Actually, fuck that! They’re more like Antebellum Era plantation owners, hoping their pet Negroes pick enough cotton to keep them cashed-up and cushy. After all, Abbott’s the same class warrior who called out her cohorts for sending their spawn to public schoolsonly to do the same thing herself; and reports suggest Jasper likes to jape-around with the pilfered purse.

Of course, while those melanite Massas live the life of Riley, they expect the po’ black folk further down the status ladder to keep singing Negro spirituals in their honour. In many ways, it resembles the paternalism of many white limo-Lefties, except that commonality of complexion allows these “leaders” a certain carte blanche not accorded to the Blancs—call it “skin colour privilege”.

The attitudes expected and expressed by Abbott go some way to explaining my aversion to racialism; folk of that worldview tend to make similar obnoxious claims on the lives, achievements, and choices of others who share their lineage . I hear it whenever endogamists bitch about interracial couples, accusing other races of “fetishism” and “stealing our men/women”; or when “conscious” fuckers mandate “giving back to the community”, dismissing any choice beyond their KwanziteWotanist-onanist dogma as “self-hating” and “inauthentic”.

As I said in an earlier episode,

Does my being a melanite mean I must be fodder for every—or indeed any—cause or cretin with the word “black” as a qualifier?

Abbott and her ilk seem to think so.

Sadly for them, not all of us play well with Procrusteans

~MRDA~

Posted in Egoism, News, Personal, Politics, Racial Issues, The UK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

“Imagine All the Sheeple…”

image

The new year heralded a new commotion, what with assorted atheists and Lennoites castigating crooner Cee Lo Green for his end-of-year take on Lennon’s ‘Imagine’.

Cee Lo’s crime? Changing Johnny-boy’s “…and no religion, too” lyric to “…and all religion’s true”: from idyllic irreligion to sloppy syncretism with just two words.

Predictably, the Lennon laity didn’t take kindly to their holy hymn being desecrated in such a fashion; however, they came across as models of restraint compared to the Atheist Army. PZ Myers, for example, came out all guns blazing with his response

It’s only a pop song, but it’s the same sentiment that led the Church to hammer the penises off of classical sculpture; that inspired Islam to blow up Buddhas; that has sects fighting over who owns which piece of rock in Jerusalem; that leads cults to burn books and records. They must pretend that dissent not only does not exist at all, but never existed any where at any time.

Whilst I can see where Myers comes from, it sounds like a lot of ire for such a pathetic palliative; despite Cee Lo being accused of trying to “kiss-up to the religious Right”, I believe him when he says cackhanded communalism, rather than rigid religiosity, motivated his message.

Indeed, with  ‘Imagine’, it really does come down to a case of plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. I mean, when I listen to the lyrics of the original, I envision a crapsaccharine world where all difference, dissent and deviation have been drained out of the gene pool in a collective Care Bear Stare: a monopsychic, if not monotheistic, nightmare.

image1

At bottom, how does Lennon’s “brotherhood of man” differ, in any fundamental way, from Jehovah’s post-apocalyptic Paradise; or, more pressingly, Cee Lo’s syncretic sludge world?

Imagine no revision…

…it’s still the same to me…

~MRDA~

Posted in Atheism, Entertainment, Moral Panic, Music, News, Philosophy, Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Season’s Bleatings and Heathen’s Greetings…

image21

As an atheist, and a bloke with a rudimentary grasp of history, I always break out a smirk when Christfolk wail about materialism and hedonism drowning out the “true meaning” of the season; seeing as how the preceding pagan festivities emphasised such qualities, before their co-option by Christ, such Godsquad griping evokes images of a rapist getting indignant at his prey for fighting back.

image22

That said, I care just as little for the whole crusade against “Christmas” being pushed by some irate co-irreligionists. Maybe it’s age, laziness, or fucked-up priorities, but hearing the words “Merry Christmas” leaves me strangely un-irritated. In an age where Christ’s (Western) fanbase weakens and dwindles, I doubt thoughts of the Little Lord Jesus hold much prominence in the minds of most well-wishers, many of them simply repeating the words as a sentiment of goodwill and good cheer.

374765_10150455232273323_126545588322_8640757_583917391_n

As such, when the bird in the chip shop wished me a “Merry Christmas” yesterday, I simply responded with “you too”: took less syllables than “happy holidays”, at any rate!

image23

Christians , stop crying! Atheists, quit angsting! Pagans, pour another one! I’ll be over here, gorging myself on gobblers, laughing at the goings-on in EastEnders, and draining the sprit of the season from the gullet of a glass…

~MRDA~

Posted in Amoralism, Atheism, Entertainment, History, Moral Panic, Personal, Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Rebuild of Evangelion: A MRDAview…

vlcsnap-2011-12-22-23h48m51s2383

Just recently managed to grab the first two installments of the new Eva movie tetralogy, Rebuild of Evangelion. Turns out that director Hideaki Anno saw fit to remake his global success of a show for the big screen and, so, far, I’d say that I prefer it to the original. To summarize, the first flick, You Are (Not) Alone, does a Dragon Ball Kai, streamlining a chunk of the original source material into a (relatively) bite-sized, better animated slice of pie; whilst the second, You Can (Not) Advance, branches out in a bold new direction, shedding much of the baggage that weighed down the previous incarnation.

So, what stands out for me about this series so far?

Continue reading

Posted in Animé, Entertainment, Movies, Retinal Reprobation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Halal & Hypocrisy VII: Corroded Justice

Justice consists in the recognition of equality and the rendering of equity.

Victor S. Yarros

image25

I had to roll my eyes at this one.

A gang of Muslim girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion.

The group screamed ‘kill the white slag’ while kicks raining in on 22-year-old Rhea Page as she lay motionless on the ground, the court heard.

The attackers – three sisters and their cousin – were told by a judge that normally they would have been sent to jail.

However, he handed the girls – all Somalian Muslims – suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.

Daily Mail Online, 6th December 2011

On the same day that the State locked up racist tram mum Emma West “for her own protection”, I read about this case of violent racism being met with a judicial wrist-slap.

Not very good PR for the Brit justice system, is it? Some racist, white, gobby bird gets locked away for being…well…a racist, white, gobby bird; and a violent flock of racist, black, Muzzie birds avoid a similar fate on account  of being…black Muzzie birds.

Ah well—at least our justice system can’t be accused of “white privilege”, right?

Scoffing aside, this whole case reads like some fucked-up parody of PC lunacy, what with the assailants ticking not one but three of the limousine Left’s pet demographic boxes. Makes me wonder what would happen were these ladies also lezzers: would Page be forced to pay them minge-munching damages?

lezzer-nosh

As it stands, things are tragicomic enough. The Islam defence alone has to be one of the most pathetic excuses/rationalizations/Get Out of Jail Free cards I’ve ever cast eyes on, more worthy of an absurdist Family Guy sketch than a flesh ‘n’ oak court case (at least one not involving clinical retards). Judging from their pics, their decidedly haraam habits, and their triumphalist Tweeting (“Happy happy happy!”, “I’m so going out”), those Muslim madams hardly qualify as visions of veiled virtue.

image6 image7 image8 image9

My guess is that, like other Friday Muslims of my acquaintance, they treat their faith more like a team flag, or Good Guy Badge, than as a serious guide to life and living.

Shame their legal Lancelot, Gary Short, couldn’t grasp this: “Them Muzzies suuure do act alike, your Honour!”

Devout Muslims or not, since when does Lady Justice remove her blindfold for the pleasure of the pious? Since when did the British court system model itself on that of Saudi fucking Arabia? By such sterling logic, “honour killers” should be let loose with a caution on account of them being unaccustomed to female autonomy; and clueless Christians who exorcize the life from their kids should be excused for not being used to reality.

Let’s not forget the place of race in this little debacle. It’s rather telling that these belligerent bints didn’t at least get gavelled for their verbal spats of racial thoughtcrime, a la Emma West. Not that I favour either party being Orwelled over their tonguefarts, but aren’t both blacks and whites meant to be equals under the law? Did I miss something?

Also, what the fuck’s up with the damsel-deference?

Judge Brown said that ‘those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside’.

But he said he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend, and handed the defendants a suspended sentence.

Boo-hoo! Those frail, fragile females! Did they chip their nails on his coarse male physique?

image18

Seriously, I find this double standard bullshit pretty fucking disgusting. Bloke hits bird first? He’s a fucking monster of a man. Bird hits bloke first? That’ll teach him to leave the toilet seat up! Bird strikes bloke in self-defence? “You go, girl!” Bloke strikes bird in a similar context? “Herp-derp—turn in your man card, you misogynistic, micro-dicked faggot!” With proposed initiatives like ‘Clare’s Law’ being offered up for consideration, expect this cancer to keep on growing.

When I think of white knight twerps like Judge Brown, a line from Urotsukidōji springs to mind: “One little sniff of pussy, and [they] lose it.”

So, yes, according to The Powers that Be: if you’re Muslim, black, and female, you’re inherently less culpable, less responsible for your actions, than someone lacking one, two, or all of those traits. I can imagine the legislators of the land, sat in their plush tax-cushioned offices, shaking their heads and saying: “They can’t help it: they suffer so much in racist, sexist Kafirland, the poor babies!”

What they miss is that such thinking plays into the hands of the Nick Griffins and Tommy Robinsons they claim to combat, crafting many a Trojan Horse for them to ride ragged.

If we must live under the storm cloud of the State, I’d like a silver lining of fucking isonomy

~MRDA~

Posted in Gender Issues, Halal & Hypocrisy, News, Politics, Racial Issues, Religion, Slave Britannia, The UK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Akira: The London Connection

vlcsnap-2012-05-19-21h09m13s132

Scanning the reviews on Amazon can be good for a laugh, now and again:

 

Dishonest politicians, a city preparing for an imminent Olympics, street gangs, terrorist attacks… This could be a fable of our times, but this isn’t London 2011, this is a future Tokyo rebuilt 30 years after a Third World War, yet already descending into decadent and aimless disorder.

The Kinniburgh Kid

He missed out the rampant rioting, but, yeah, as parallels go, pretty perceptive.

It’s a shame we don’t have an orbital satellite laser to strengthen the analogy; that, and youths (or , rather, “yutes”) with psychic powers. Actually, the absence of the latter in  London’s probably a good thing! Imagine how much more fucked-up things would’ve been back in August.

vlcsnap-2012-05-19-21h03m54s15

Still, if Tetsuo were to re-emerge from his new universe to raze the Olympic stadium, it’d certainly justify the coverage (and the entrance fee)!

~MRDA~

Posted in Animé, Movies, News, Politics, The UK | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment